Dr
Adnan Zafar
The
US Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), has flagged India as a key source of fentanyl
precursors which mostly land in Mexico where
cartels synthesize them into illicit opioids and
smuggle them to elsewhere in the world. The illicit opioids is
believed to be responsible for
over 100,000 overdose deaths every year on an average in the US alone.

India’s
burgeoning pharmaceutical industry, a global leader in generic drug
production, faces growing scrutiny for its role in the export of
precursor chemicals used in fentanyl production, a synthetic opioid
fueling a global drug crisis. International reports, particularly
from U.S. authorities, have raised concerns about the flow of
chemicals like N-phenethyl-4-piperidone (NPP) and
4-anilino-N-phenethyl-4-piperidine (ANPP) from India to Mexican
cartels, such as the Sinaloa Cartel and Cártel Jalisco Nueva
Generación (CJNG). While India’s regulatory framework under the
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act aims to curb
such activities, systemic gaps in enforcement and oversight have
enabled illicit networks to thrive. For Pakistan, a neighbor
grappling with its own drug trafficking challenges, these
developments pose significant security and diplomatic implications.
This article examines India’s role in precursor exports, the
regulatory challenges facilitating this trade, and its broader impact
on regional stability, underscoring the need for stronger oversight
to mitigate global narcotics threats.
Indian
Smuggling Network of illicit Drugs
India’s
pharmaceutical sector, valued at $50 billion annually, is a critical
supplier of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and precursor
chemicals to global markets. However, many
international
agencies, including. The US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), has flagged India as a key source of fentanyl precursors which mostly land in Mexico where cartels synthesize them into illicit opioids and smuggle them to elsewhere in the world. The illicit opioids is believed to be responsible for over 100,000 overdose deaths every year on an average in the US alone. Chemicals like NPP and ANPP, essential for fentanyl production, are
produced legally in India for medicinal purposes but are reportedly
diverted to illicit networks through mislabeled shipments or
unregulated firms. Mexican cartels have capitalized on India’s
industrial hubs, particularly in states like Gujarat and Maharashtra,
to procure these precursors. Reports suggest that front companies,
often posing as legitimate exporters, facilitate shipments to Mexico,
misdeclaring chemicals as “industrial solvents” or “food
additives” to evade detection. The
DEA has noted a surge in such exports since 2020, with India’s lax
oversight enabling small-scale manufacturers to bypass export
controls. Unlike China, which tightened precursor regulations in
2019, India’s fragmented regulatory system struggles to monitor its
thousands of pharmaceutical units, many operating in loosely
regulated industrial zones. Criminal syndicates, including remnants
of historical networks and newer groups, are believed to coordinate
with local intermediaries to streamline this trade. These networks
exploit India’s global trade connectivity, using ports like
Mumbai’s Jawaharlal Nehru Port for bulk shipments. Smaller
consignments reportedly travel through air cargo, concealed in
commercial goods, highlighting the sophistication of smuggling
operations. While India has cooperated with international law
enforcement, seizing 23,000 kg of precursors in 2023, the scale of
the trade suggests deeper systemic issues, raising questions about
enforcement efficacy. India’s
regulatory framework under the NDPS Act classifies substances like
acetic anhydride and piperidine as controlled precursors, requiring
strict licensing and monitoring. However, enforcement remains
inconsistent, particularly in state-managed industrial zones.
Gujarat, a hub for chemical manufacturing, has faced criticism for
inadequate oversight of state-owned enterprises, where bulk sales of
precursors reportedly occur without rigorous checks. Similarly,
industrial areas in Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh host small-scale
factories that exploit regulatory loopholes, producing precursors for
both legitimate and illicit markets. Weak coordination between
central and state authorities exacerbates these challenges.
Incapacity
and incompetence of Indian anti-Narcotics Agency
The
Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB), India’s primary anti-drug agency,
lacks the resources to monitor thousands of chemical firms, relying
heavily on state police and regulatory bodies. Reports indicate that
local oversight often fails to verify export licenses or inspect
shipments, allowing misdeclared cargo to reach international markets.
The absence of real-time tracking systems for precursor chemicals,
unlike in developed economies, further complicates enforcement
efforts. Allegations of oversight failures have also surfaced, with
international observers noting that regulatory agencies sometimes
issue certifications without due diligence. This enables illicit
networks to operate under the guise of legitimate trade, undermining
India’s commitments to global anti-narcotics frameworks like the UN
Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs. While India has
taken steps to strengthen controls, such as increasing NCB funding in
2024, systemic gaps persist, posing challenges to curbing the
precursor trade.
Implications
of Indian illicit drugs on Pakistan

For
Pakistan, India’s role in fentanyl precursor exports carries
significant security implications, given its proximity and ongoing
struggle with drug trafficking. The Afghan-Pakistan border, a conduit
for heroin and methamphetamine, faces increased pressure from
synthetic drugs, with precursor chemicals potentially fueling
regional illicit markets. Pakistani authorities, already combating
groups like the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), view the spillover
of India’s regulatory failures as a threat to national security,
exacerbating cross-border crime. The broader regional impact extends
to global narcotics networks, as Mexico’s cartels leverage India’s
precursors to flood markets in North America and Europe. This illicit trade undermines stability in South Asia, where drug revenues can
finance insurgent activities, a concern for Pakistan given its
counter terrorism efforts.
Diplomatically, in the past
Pakistan has raised these issues in forums like the South Asian
Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC),
urging India to strengthen its
regulatory framework to prevent regional destabilization. India’s
challenges also strain its international relations, particularly with
the US, which has pressed New Delhi to align with global
anti-narcotics efforts. The lack of robust enforcement risks
perceptions of India as a weak link in the global supply chain,
potentially affecting trade partnerships. For Pakistan, this presents
an opportunity to advocate for regional cooperation, emphasizing
shared security interests to counter the narcotics threat.
India’s
role in the export of fentanyl precursors highlights a critical gap
in its regulatory framework, enabling illicit networks to supply
Mexican cartels which is
threatening
global security. Systemic challenges, from weak oversight to
fragmented enforcement, undermine India’s efforts to curb this
illegal trade.
For Pakistan, the spillover effects pose direct security risks,
amplifying the need for regional cooperation. Strengthening India’s
NDPS Act enforcement, enhancing inter-agency coordination, and
adopting real-time tracking systems are essential to address these
gaps. As a key player in global pharmaceuticals, India must balance
its economic ambitions with its responsibility to prevent illicit
precursor flows and must
ensure the
stability in South Asia
by undertaking emergency measures to
curb the smuggling of illicit drugs.
Dr Adnan Zafar, is a
freelance writer and Open Source Analyst specializing in geopolitical
and security issues. His work focuses on South Asian dynamics,
drawing on extensive research to provide nuanced insights into
regional challenges.
0 Comments